#5758 closed enhancement (fixed)
Rename "Avatar" to "Profile Photo"
Reported by: | sooskriszta | Owned by: | sooskriszta |
---|---|---|---|
Milestone: | 2.1 | Priority: | normal |
Severity: | normal | Version: | |
Component: | I18N | Keywords: | has-patch commit |
Cc: | sooskriszta, ubernaut, naton |
Description
At the moment, we use the term "Avatar" to refer to primary images uploaded by members. This might partly be due to the fact that BuddyPress pulls "avatars" from Gravatar.
I propose that we rename this to "Profile Photo"
There is a definite desire to encourage users to upload profile photos #4132 The gravatar connection is tenuous.
"Profile photo" is better than "Avatar" for several reasons:
- Profile photo is universally understood and translatable. Avatar is not.
- Profile photo does, somewhat boringly, exactly what it says on the can. Avatar can be a bit ambiguous, childish or nerdy (depending on the context).
- Profile photo has "photo" in the term. We want to encourage those. Avatar has the connotation of a graphic or illustration (check out my avatar on bp.org and contrast it with jjj's profile photo). And no, I'm not talking out of my a## here. The likes of Yahoo! allow both profile photos/pictures/images and avatars They are by no means alone in this regard. Compare Live profile images and Xbox avatars.
- Profile photo is the near-universal terminology and has higher usability even for people not intimately familiar with the English language. What do I mean by near-universal? Here are some users of "Profile Photo" (or similar): Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+/Blogger/Youtube, Meetup, etc.
Attachments (1)
Change History (13)
#2
@
10 years ago
- Cc imath johnjamesjacoby djpaul boonebgorges removed
- Owner set to DJPaul
- Status changed from new to assigned
Also, please don't CC anyone from the core team into your tickets. We really do read every ticket, anyway. :)
#4
@
10 years ago
- Owner set to sooskriszta
Sorry about that. I just cc'd the folks that discussed this in devchat a few weeks ago.
Will have to look up how to submit patches again, but this seems easy enough...
#6
@
10 years ago
Thanks for working on a patch. We'll take a look at changes soon, hopefully over the next few days.
Sure, sounds good. If you're able to work on a patch, we could get the change into 2.1.