Context Navigation

Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #5625, comment 29

initial	v1
3	3	Alternatively, you could consider 2 different types of text fields: simple text and rich text. In that case, the richtext support would go into field type.
4	4
5		Of course this depends on where you think richtext support is needed. I think it's needed only for textareas so simple text type and rich text type makes sense to me. If, however, you want rich text to be available to other fields (I struggle to think of examples) then obviously it would be absurd to create 2 versions of each.
	5	Of course this depends on where you think richtext support is needed. I think it's needed only for textareas so simple text type and rich text type makes sense to me. If, however, you want rich text to be available to other field types (I struggle to think of examples) then obviously it would be absurd to create 2 versions of each.